More Reviews
I checked metacritic for film reviewers' takes on Black Snake Moan. Metacritic's total review score is 53. I did this mostly in response to the comment that feministing's review was "knee jerk." Some excerpts:
From Premiere Mag's Glenn Kenny:
Perpetually wide-eyed and mega-snarly bedraggled, Christina Ricci prowls through Black Snake Moan looking like something the cat dragged in.If you're anything like me, you'll be very grateful to the cat. (Whoza good kitty? Boo zha zha zha . . . )
Now, these days, chaining a woman to a radiator — even if it's for her own good! — is all kinds of unacceptable. And Brewer's self-imposed mission is not just to make you accept it but to make you like it.
From New York Magazine's David Edelstein:
At bottom, Black Snake Moan is an old-fashioned feel-good, Sunday-schoolish kind of parable about a broken, bitter ex-alcoholic who’s spiritually reborn by, uh, chaining a little white nympho in shorty-cutoffs to his radiator. But it’s not how you think! Wouldn’t you have chained Anna Nicole to your radiator if you could have saved her? Wouldn’t you chain Britney to your radiator?
Okay, it is pretty sexist. But Ricci’s character, Rae, isn’t a predatory she-devil. She’s an abused and profoundly damaged young woman. She needs therapy—or an exorcism.
It's unclear if he saw the film or not, but check out his awesome sexist comments. Yeah I'd totally chain someone to a radiator. Right...
From Rolling Stone's Peter Travers
Offensive on multiple levels -- if only the plot had any levels at all -- Black Snake Moan leaves no Tobacco Road cliche unsmoked. Ricci gives it her all, and then some, but even her body and Jackson's blues can't heal a movie that rockets plum off its nut.
From the Holly Wood Reporter's Kirk Honeycutt:
Certainly the image of Ricci wearing panties and a peek-a-boo top getting dragged around by Jackson tugging on a chain wrapped around her tiny waist is one any publisher of '50s dime novels would have loved for a book cover if only he dared....Seems she gets these spells that start in her head and work their way down to her crotch. When she goes into heat like this, only intercourse with the nearest male can relieve her suffering.
For some reason this reminds me of a time when people believed a woman's uterus could float into her brain and make her insane. The combination of sexuality and mental health (with some hints towards witchcraft) is pretty sweet huh.
Rob Nelson with the Village Voice views the film as an exploitation film, but considers this not bad. He then writes his review, admittedly, as an exploitation. I don't even know where to begin with his review.
There were NO female reviewers of this film, at least not yet. It comes out Friday, so hopefully some bloggers or female reviewers pop up.
I'm still not convinced there is ever a time or place to be portraying or supporting this, as a satire, social commentary, purposeful exploitation, entertainment, whatever. Especially in a society where sexism, sex violence, and women hating is prevalent enough, why make it worse by creating a film like this, marketing it as some near-comedy about a slutty white girl enslaved by a scary black man, and then leave it to the viewer's own devices to come up with an educated conclusion. I guess I have no faith in my fellow Americans.
Still, I'd really like to read other feminists opinions on the film when they've seen it.
Labels: feminism









